The legislator who informs about God and takes it from his understanding and consideration by applying an analogy to himself in terms of his possibility and nature is pure and not purified, so know that < h3 style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">( Chapter on water used in purification )
Sharia scholars differed about water used for purification in three schools of thought. Some say it is not permissible to purify it, some say purity is permissible with it, and with it I say, and some say it is disliked to purify with it, and it is not permissible to perform tayammum in its presence, and a fourth opinion is deviant, which is that it is impure. < /p
(The internal ruling on this has arrived) [Does using water take it out of the description of its release]
As for the internal ruling on it, know that the reason for this The disagreement is that it is not possible for that water to be called absolute water or not. So whoever sees that it is released says that it is permissible to purify it, and whoever sees that its use has affected its release, it is not permissible for that or he dislikes it to the extent of his strength. As for those who say that it is impure, this is an invalid statement, even though The one who said it was one of the eminent scholars, and he was Abu Yusuf.
[ Referring monotheism to the essence after using it in the singularity of actions ]
Know that knowledge