Impurity is one of its descriptions, and the author of this ruling rejects the hadith that he used as evidence for us, for the legislator said that nothing makes it impure. So how did this person who used it as evidence here consider it and did not consider it in the way we went to, that it is purified but not pure, and that is necessary for him, and he does not have legal evidence to reject it, and the fourth ruling is purified but not pure. It is pure, and it is the chapter that we are talking about, because it is water that has been mixed with impurity and none of its characteristics have changed. And whoever says that there is a difference between a little and a lot, they said that if it is a lot, it is not impure, and if it is a little, it is impure, and he did not specify a limit for it. Rather, he said that it is impure even if one of its characteristics has not changed < H3 style= "color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">[ The difference in the limit of a little and a lot of water ]

Then these people disagreed on the limit between a little and a lot, and the disagreement regarding the same limit is well-known in the schools of thought, not in the text of Sharia. The correct view is that the hadiths in this matter have been discussed, such as the hadith of two small amounts and the hadith of forty, a lack of it. Then there is disagreement between them regarding the limit of smallness, and many issues branch out on this topic, such as the occurrence of water in impurity, the occurrence of impurity in water, urine in standing water, and so on, and people have many schools of thought regarding this, and this book is not the place for it. We did not intend to investigate all the related rulings.