To nothingness and negation, and negation is not an intrinsic attribute because the intrinsic attributes of existing things are only proven. What happened to this thinker who hesitated between affirming and denying knowledge of God is something
« Question » [Knowing what is restricted by the Absolute]
How can one who is restricted by knowing the Absolute and its essence does not require it, and how can the possible reach the knowledge of what is necessary in itself? There is no aspect of the possible except that it is permissible for it to be nothingness, obscurity, and lack. If he combines what is obligatory in itself and what is possible, there is a reason for what is permissible for what is obligatory. What is permissible for the possible in that sense of obscurity and lack, and this in the case of the obligatory is impossible, so proving a facet that combines the obligatory and the possible is impossible, because the faces of the possible are subordinate to it, and in itself it is permissible for non-existence, so its consequences are more likely and deserving of this ruling, and it is proven for the possible what is proven for the necessary in itself from that comprehensive facet, and so on. Something is proven for the possible in terms of what is established for the necessary in itself, so the existence of a combined aspect between the possible and the necessary in itself is impossible.
« Issue” [Divinity has rulings]
But I say that divinity has rulings, even if they are rulings, and in the form of these rulings, manifestation occurs in the afterlife, wherever it is, for there is disagreement.