[ The reason that necessitates the existence of the world ]

The first question in this chapter is: What is the reason that necessitates the existence of the world so that it can be said that the world came into existence for such and such a thing, and that is the matter on which it depends? The validity of its existence is either a cause and requires its effect for itself. If this is the case, is it correct for the effect to have two causes, or more, or not? This is in rational consideration, not in positivism. If the causes are multiple, is their multiplicity due to existential entities, or are they related to one thing? And then there are matters on which the validity of their existence depends. On a condition that precedes it or conditions, and all of that is united by the name of the cause, and the condition is a rule, and the cause is a rule. Is the world in its lack of the cause that necessitates its existence the effect’s lack of the cause or the conditioned’s lack of the condition? Whichever it is, the other is not the case. The cause seeks the effect for its own sake, and the condition does not seek the conditioned for its own sake. Knowledge is conditioned by life and does not The existence of life necessitates the existence of knowledge, but the fact that the world is a world is not the same. Knowledge is a reason for the world being a world. If knowledge is elevated, then his being a world is elevated. In this respect, it is similar to the condition. If life is elevated, knowledge is elevated, and if his being a scientist is elevated, then knowledge is removed. So it is distinguished from the condition, since if knowledge is elevated, then no It is necessary for life to rise, for these are two reasonable orders that have been distinguished. One is called a cause and the other is called a condition

[ the relation of the world in its existence to the truth ] So is the proportion of the world

---

---