Fütûhât-ı Mekkiyye

Yazma cildi 29 · Sayfa 12

Konya yazması

Arapça kaynağı açİngilizce çeviriyi aç

Arapça

قلت لما قيل لي إن له

في الذي يهواه منه غرضا

فالذي أخر عن تحصيله

لم يكن إلا لأمر عرضا

(القضاء وحال المقضي عليه)

اعلم أن الله تعالى عرف أن نسبة القضاء إلى القاضي لا تصح حتى يقضي، صلاحية ووجودا، ولا يصح له هٰذا الاسم حتى يقضي. ولا يعين القضاء إلا حال المقضي عليه فالقضاء أمر معقول لا وجود له إلا بالمقضي به، والمقضي به يعينه حال المقضي عليه، وبهذه الجملة يثبت اسم القاضي.

فلو ارتفعت هذه الجملة من الذهن ارتفع اسم القاضي، ولو ارتفعت من الوجود ارتفع أيضا حقيقة. فإن أطلق، أطلق مجازا وحقيقة المجاز[5] والتجوّز أن ينسب الوقوع إلى ما ليس بواقع.

المثال في ذٰلك: ادعى شخص على شخص دينا وأنكر المدَّعَى عليه. فعينت الدعوى إقامة البينة، وهو المقضي به على صاحب الدعوى، وعين الإنكار المقضي به على المنكر، وهو اليمين إذا لم تقم البينة.

وحدث اسم القاضي حقيقة للحاكم باليمين على المدَّعَى عليه، إذا أنكر، وطلب

Notlar

[5]

(كان الرسم في النسخة السابقة «مجاز أو حقيقة المجاز»، وصُحّح إلى «مجازا وحقيقة المجاز» بمقابلة الطبعة الجديدة (ج١٠، ص١٨٣).)

İngilizce

I said, when I was told that he

Had an aim in what he desired of it:

What delayed its attainment

Was only a matter that arose incidentally.

(Decree and the State of the One Decreed Concerning)

Know that God, exalted is He, has made known that attributing decree to the judge is not sound until he judges, whether in qualification or actuality. This name is not sound for him until he judges. Nothing determines the decree but the state of the one decreed concerning. Decree is an intelligible matter having no existence except through what is decreed, and what is decreed is determined by the state of the one decreed concerning. Through this totality the name ‘judge’ is established.

If this totality were removed from the mind, the name ‘judge’ would be removed. If it were removed from existence, the name would likewise truly be removed. If then applied, it would be applied metaphorically. The reality of metaphor[5] and figurative usage is to attribute occurrence to what has not occurred.

An example: someone claims a debt against another person, and the defendant denies it. The claim determines the production of evidence, which is what is decreed concerning the claimant. The denial determines what is decreed concerning the denier, namely the oath, if no evidence is produced.

The name ‘judge’ truly originates for the one ruling that the defendant must swear an oath, when he denies the claim, and demanding

Notlar

[5]

(The previous version read ‘majāz aw ḥaqīqat al-majāz’ [metaphor or the reality of metaphor]; this was corrected to ‘majāzan wa-ḥaqīqat al-majāz’ [metaphorically, and the reality of metaphor] by comparison with the new edition, vol. 10, p. 183.)

Yazma görüntüsüYazma cildi 29 · Sayfa 12

Arapça ve İngilizce aynı Konya sayfa kimliğiyle bağlanır. Sayfa eşleştirmesi yaklaşıktır; doğrulamak için yazma görüntüsüne bakın.

Kahire kaynak referansı

Ibn al-Arabi, The Meccan Revelations — Yazma cildi 29 · Sayfa 12 — https://www.futmak.com/turkce/konya/pages.php?id=8572&text=both