There is divine love: God’s love for the servant and the servant’s love for his Lord, as He said, “He loves them, and they love Him” [al-Maʾida 5:54]. Its culmination from the two sides is that the servant witnesses his being a locus of the Real’s manifestation. He is to that manifest Real as the spirit is to the body, (whose) inward aspect he is, hidden within it, never perceived, and witnessed only by a lover. And the Real becomes a locus of the servant’s manifestation, taking on the bounds, measures, and accidents that characterize the servant. He [the Real] witnesses this servant, who then becomes beloved of the Real. If the affair is as we have said, love has no essential definition through which it is known. It is defined only through descriptive and verbal definitions. Whoever defines love has not known it; whoever has not tasted it in drinking has not known it; and whoever says, “My thirst for it is quenched,” has not known it. Love is drinking without satiety. One of the veiled said, “I drank a draught, after which I never thirsted.” Abu Yazid said, “The man is one who sips the seas while his tongue hangs out upon his breast from thirst.” This is what we have alluded to.
Know that love may be natural while the beloved is not of the world of nature. Love can be natural only if the lover belongs to the world of nature; this is necessary. Natural love is caused by a look or by hearing. In the beholder’s imagination something arises from what he saw, if the beloved is among what sight perceives; or in the hearer’s imagination from what he heard. He carries it within his constitution and gives it form in his imagination through the form-giving faculty.
Notlar
Translator’s note TN3743-1: The spirit/body comparison is retained in its supplied direction: the servant is likened to the spirit in relation to the manifest Real as body. The pronouns are implicit; the bracketed Real is taken as the subject witnessing the servant, who is then called beloved of the Real. The passage presents the relation reciprocally rather than replacing it with a more familiar formula.