The focus of the hadith is on him, but if a trustworthy person shares it with him, he heard it with him before that hadith through that trustworthy person, and this is a guardian who heard it from the spirit, imparting it on the truth of Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, just as he heard the Companions in the hadith of Gabriel, peace be upon him, with Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, in Islam. Faith and benevolence are in his belief in it, and if he hears it from the casting spirit, then it is in him like the companion who heard it from the mouth of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, knowledge that he does not doubt, unlike the follower, who accepts it on the path of suspicion due to the high level of accusation affecting the truthfulness. Perhaps a hadith that is authentic from the path of its narrators obtains this. Al-Mukashif, who had seen this manifestation, asked the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, about this authentic hadith, but he denied it and said to him, “I did not say it, nor did I rule according to it.” So he knows its weakness, so he abandons acting on it based on proof from his Lord, even if the people of transmission have acted on it due to the validity of its method, and in the same matter it is not so, and he mentioned. Muslim is like this in the beginning of his Sahih book, and this revealer of the fabrication of that authentic hadith may know its method in their claim that either he is named or a person is created for him. These are the prophets of the saints and they are never unique in Sharia law and they do not have a discourse on it except by definition. This is what it is.