Jesus is in God’s eyes like Adam, so he made the analogy with regard to the lack of male paternity for the reason that he set him up as evidence for Jesus regarding the innocence of his mother, and he did not make the comparison with Eve, even though the matter was on him because the woman was the subject of the accusation for the presence of the pregnancy since she was the subject of birth, and the man was not a place for that, and what is meant by the evidence. Doubts are high, and there is no ambiguity regarding Eve from Adam, because Adam was not the subject of what came from him through birth, and this is no evidence except for those who have proven the existence of Adam, his formation, and the creation from him. Just as a son cannot be known without a father, likewise he cannot be known without a mother. So the example, by way of meaning, is that Jesus is like Eve, but since the implication of this was considered reprehensible, because the female, as we said, is subject to what came from her, and therefore the accusation was that the likeness to Adam was due to the innocence of Mary, which is usually possible, so the appearance of Jesus, son of Mary, without a father is like the appearance of Eve from Adam, without a mother, and he is the second father.

[ Eve’s separation from Adam ]

And when Eve was separated from Adam, her place with him increased due to the marital desire for her, in which unconsciousness occurred due to the appearance of reproduction and generation, and the air that came out was Whose place was established in Eve's body when she emerged, since there is no void in the world, so that airy part sought its place, which Eve had taken with her personality, so Adam moved to seek its place and found it.