There is disagreement among scholars about the presence of the “ba” in his saying, “By your heads.” So whoever made it to be a part of the wiping, and whoever made it additional for emphasis in the wiping included the wiping of the entire head, and the “ba” in this situation is the presence of the occurring power, so it is not devoid of either having an effect on the decreed, so the someness is valid, which is the saying of Al-Mu’tazili and others, or it is not. It has an effect on what is decreed in one way or the other, so it is superfluous, as Al-Ash’ari says, so its ruling is dropped, so the old ability applies to wiping the entire head, and its wiping does not replace the existing ability, and the limit of taking into account emphasis, in that it is superfluous to emphasis, is the acquisition that the Ash’aris said, which is what God Almighty said in more than one place in His Book by adding gain. And action is directed to the created being. That is why they made its addition a meaning called emphasis

[ The Arabs in their speech contrast the excess with the excess ]

Don’t you see the Arabs contrasting the excess with the excess in their speech? You want this affirmation and respond to the speaker with it. If he confirms his statement, the speaker says, “Zaid is standing,” or he says, “Zaid is standing.” The listener says in an answer, “Zaid is standing, but Zaid is standing,” and in an answer, “Indeed, Zayd is standing,” then he confirms what the speaker denied, or denies what the speaker affirmed. If the speaker confirms his affirmation, he says, Zaid is standing, so insert the L to confirm the confirmation of standing. The respondent inserted the B in the opposite of the L to confirm