What could be and what could not be, then the description of it is invalidated in terms of the reality of that description, all that remains is the participation in the word, since the participation in the definition and the truth has been invalidated, so the attribute of the truth and the attribute of the servant are combined into one definition at all, so then the expulsion of what they said is invalidated, and they expelled it as witness and absent, so it was not our statement. Concerning God, He is knowledgeable according to what we say regarding the possible and the created, He is knowledgeable through the definition of knowledge and its reality. Attributing knowledge to God contradicts the attribution of knowledge to possible creation, even if the essence of ancient knowledge is the essence of modern knowledge, they would be united by one subjective definition, I mean the two sciences, and what would be impossible for him would be impossible for the like of him. In terms of itself, we found the matter to be otherwise . This group sought to attain something of what was reported in the divine news from the side of truth, and they began to refine their hearts with remembrances and recitation of the Qur’an, clearing the place of considering the possible, being present, and observing, while purifying the apparent by staying within the legitimate limits of lowering one’s gaze to the matters that it is forbidden to look at, such as private parts and other things. And sending it to the things that give him consideration and insight, as well as his hearing, his tongue, his hands, his feet, his stomach, his private parts, and his heart.