With it, on the authority of the scholars of theorizing, who stopped as their thoughts reached them while verifying the truthfulness of the reports, and they said, “We know that there is another phase beyond the phase of understanding the mind that is independent of it, and it is for the prophets and the greatest saints through which they accept these matters that were brought to them in the divine presence, so this group worked to achieve this through the means of seclusion and legitimate remembrances.” Because of the purity of hearts and their purity from the filth of thought, since the thinker only thought about newly created things, not about the essence of truth and what should be in himself, which is the name of God, and he did not find a psychological attribute of proof, so he began to look at every attribute that the newly created thing could accept, and that he could take it away from God, lest he be bound by a ruling. This attribute is also necessary for the possible to occur, as some theologians did in matters that they confirmed and dismissed as witnesses and absent. It is impossible for the essence of truth to combine with the possible in an attribute, for every attribute that characterizes the possible ceases to exist with the disappearance of what is described by it, or it ceases with the existence of the possible as attributes of meanings, and the first as attributes. The soul, then every attribute of it is possible, so if they exclude it as witness and absent, they have described the necessary existence for itself as what is possible for itself, and the necessary existence for itself is not accepted.