And the thing does not burden itself, so there must be a place that accepts the discourse for it to be correct, and from a standpoint we establish actions for the created thing according to what the wisdom of assignment and negation requires, corresponding to proof, so this consideration throws us into confusion just as it threw us into confusion, and confusion does not yield anything, so rational consideration leads to confusion, and manifestation leads to confusion, so what Then there is nothing but confusion, and then there is no judge except confusion, and then there is nothing but God. When these rulings met in his mind, some of them would say: Oh confusion, oh astonishment, oh burning that cannot be understood. And what is this ruling for another presence other than this divine presence?