It is not permissible, for I have pointed out two matters. The distinction has occurred, so there must be a separation that makes sense. If it were not for that separation, there would not be multiplicity in the essence of the one, so what remains for the one is its singularity, by which it is said that it is not the essence of the other, and by what it is said that it is the essence of the other is the singularity of multiplicity, for He multiplied by pronouncing an alif with a jim on it, then he said in establishing the proof, “All of this is this,” so he indicated, multiplied, and repeated the pronoun, uniting, connecting, and separating.

So the decision is in the eye of the connection for the one who has reasoned, so if someone else considers what we have presented and knows that it was not in the image of the world, but rather He was in the form of the Truth. The Truth took pleasure in his names in order to show him of His signs in him, so he would know that he is th