The Meccan Revelations

Manuscript volume 14 · Page 48

Konya manuscript

Open Arabic sourceOpen English translation

Arabic

إن الذي فيه يوكل ربه

عبد الإله يقارن التنزيلا

يا طالبا ما ليس يعلم ما له

لا تتخذ غير الإله وكيلا

التوكل اعتماد القلب على الله تعالى، مع عدم الاضطراب عند فقد الأسباب الموضوعة في العالم، التي من شأن النفوس أن تركن إليها، فإن اضطرب فليس بمتوكل.

وهو من صفات المؤمنين، فما ظنك بالعلماء من المؤمنين؟ وإن كان التوكل لا يكون للعالم إلا من كونه مؤمنا، كما قيده الله به، وما قيده سدى، فلو كان من صفات العلماء ويقتضيه العلم النظري، ما قيده بالإيمان، فلا يقع في التوكل مشاركة، من غير المؤمن، بأي شريعة كان.

وسبب ذٰلك أن الله تعالى لا يجب عليه شيء عقلا، إلا ما أوجبه على نفسه، فيقبله بصفة الايمان، لا بصفة العلم، فإنه ﴿فَعَّالٌ لِما يُرِيدُ﴾ [هود: 107].

فلما ضمن ما ضمن، وأخبر بأنه يفعل أحد الممكنين، اعتمدنا عليه في ذٰلك، على التعيين، وصدقناه، لأنه بالدليل والعلم النظري فعلم صدقه، فسكوننا وعدم اضطرابنا عند فقد الأسباب، إنما هو من إيماننا بضمانه، فلو بقينا مع العلم اضطربنا، فالعالم إذا سكن فمن كونه مؤمنا[16]، وكونه مؤمنا من كونه عالما بصدق الضامن.

(جهة الوكالة وما يقع فيه التوكيل)

وتحقيق الوكالة: من يستحقها، هل الله، أو هل العالم، أو هل لله منها نصيب، وللعالم نصيب؟ فاعلم إن الوكالة لا تصح إلا

Notes

[16]

(يفرق المؤلف بين العلم بإمكان الفعل وبين الإيمان بصدق الوعد المعين؛ ويجعل السكون إلى الضمان من جهة الإيمان.)

English

That concerning which God’s servant appoints his Lord

as agent accords with the revelation.

O seeker of what he does not know is his,

take none but the Deity as agent.

Trust is the heart’s reliance upon God, exalted is He, without disturbance when the causes established within the cosmos, upon which souls customarily rest, are absent. If he is disturbed, he is not trusting.

It is an attribute of believers. What, then, do you think of the learned among believers? Yet trust belongs to the learned person only insofar as he believes, as God has restricted it, not without purpose. Were it an attribute of the learned and required by reflective knowledge, He would not have restricted it to faith. No nonbeliever shares in trust, whatever the revealed Law may be.

The reason is that nothing is rationally obligatory upon God, exalted is He, except what He makes obligatory upon Himself. This is accepted through faith rather than through knowledge, for He is “Doer of whatever He wills” [Hud 11:107].

When He guarantees what He guarantees and reports that He will do one of the two possible things, we rely upon Him in that specific matter and affirm His truthfulness. His truthfulness is known through proof and reflective knowledge. Our stillness and lack of disturbance when causes are absent arise only from faith in His guarantee. Had we remained with knowledge, we would be disturbed. When the knower is still, it is insofar as he believes,[16] and he believes insofar as he knows the guarantor’s truthfulness.

(The Direction of Agency and the Matter Delegated)

To establish agency: who merits it—God or the cosmos, or does God have a share and the cosmos a share? Know that agency is valid only

Notes

[16]

(The author distinguishes knowledge of an act’s possibility from faith in the truth of the specific promise. He assigns stillness concerning the guarantee to faith.)

Translator’s note TN4110-1: Tawakkul is trust; tawkil is appointing an agent and wakil is agent. The author grounds trust in faith in the specific divine guarantee, while reflective knowledge establishes the guarantor’s truthfulness without itself fixing which possible act He will perform.

Manuscript imageManuscript volume 14 · Page 48

Arabic and English are linked by the same Konya page ID. Page alignment is approximate; consult the manuscript image for verification.

Cairo source reference

Ibn al-Arabi, The Meccan Revelations — Manuscript volume 14 · Page 48 — https://www.futmak.com/english/konya/pages.php?id=4110&text=both