He becomes poor, for his pain is more severe and his grief is greater, for his ruling is the ruling of one who was held captive and was free, and he experiences the pain of enslavement because it occurred as a result of freedom.

Whoever was a king and returned A king *** has acquired a fatal death and died a fatal death

And the original slave who represents the serf does not find that, so that is why he said, “He is poorer than me.” God made him pronounce that from a place where he did not realize it, so that it would be appropriate for what I pronounced him with also in his saying of fasting, he came upon me.

So consider the wisdom of God in establishing these truths in His servants from where they do not perceive. He is the one speaking the truth, not their concern. This is the rule of expiation for whoever did this. Praise be to God. All the sayings that we mentioned in this issue have entered into this. If you reflect on them, there is no need to prolong this, for Such as repetition, even if mentioning it includes benefits in excess of what we mentioned due to the difference in proportions, but this is sufficient in considering this issue.

Some people said that he must make up for it and the expiation that he was obligated to have for intercourse, and others said that he does not have to make up for it, and what I say is that he does not have to make up for it or make up for it, because he never makes it up, but he does many voluntary fasts so that his obligatory fasts will be completed for him from his voluntary ones, for the obligatory duties with us are restricted to times, so Its time was gone by deliberately being obligatory for him, and he will never make it up at all, so he should do a lot of voluntary acts that are appropriate for it, except for Hajj, even if it is tied to a time, but it is once in a lifetime, except for those who say that he is able, but when he performs Hajj, he is performing it and is sinful in delaying it even though he is able.

Eating and drinking nourished him, so eating and drinking revived him for this reason, because his life was benefited, just as his existence was benefited, so that what is possible and necessary by others is distinguished from what is necessary by itself, and fasting is for God, not for the servant, so there is no making up for it or expiation

And whoever says about atonement, it is obligatory for him to cover his position and his ruling on it is the ruling of councils in considering it equal, and whoever says about making up for it says that he is not obligated to make up for it except that he is jealous, as was the origin of the obligation, as it was in fasting Ramadan, and it is equal, so he makes up for it by returning it to the one who fasted for him, because fasting is for the servant who It is for God, just like someone who advances something from someone else. His repayment of that debt is only to return it to the one who deserves it, along with the benefit he has received from it. The servant only fasts with the intention of borrowing that because the steadfastness is not for him, and fasting is the steadfastness, so it is for God, not for him, so know that.

This is out of divine jealousy. When a servant is characterized by what belongs to God, even if it is lawful, which is fasting, God makes him forget that he is fasting, and places him in a position and state that spoils his fasting, alerting him that this truth is only characterized by God, divine jealousy, to review what he is. He has a kind of participation, and when the slave did not intend to do so and did not violate the sanctity of the person responsible, the fulfillment of the obligation, expiation, and intercourse are forfeited. Its meaning is known in the case of one who has intercourse intentionally.

And whoever says that he must make up for it without atonement, he says that he bears witness to his perseverance rather than himself in the event that he performs it, so he is described by it, not described by it, like his saying, “And you did not shoot when you shot,” so he denied and affirmed

And whoever said that he must make up for it and make up for it, he said: Forgetting is abandonment, and fasting is abandonment, and abandonment is the opposite of abandonment, just as non-existence does not exist, and from this state of affairs, abandonment, which is fasting, did not do it. He did not comply with what he was assigned, so there is no difference between him and what is intentional, so he is required to make up for it and make up for it, and the consideration has already been mentioned. In that, and it is not in the hadith that that Bedouin was remembering his fast when he had intercourse with his family, nor was he not remembering, and the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, did not elaborate on whether he was remembering his fast or not remembering, and they came together in deliberately having intercourse, so it is obligatory for the forgetful person just as it is obligatory for the one who remembers his fast, especially in consideration. The

So he said to him, “Emancipate,” then he said to him, “fast,” then he said to him, “feed.” It is not known whether he, peace be upon him, intended the order or not, so it was said that it is in order, the first of which is emancipation, and if he does not find it, then fasting, and if he is not able to do so, then feeding. It was said that it is based on the choice, and some of them recommended feeding. More than emancipation and fasting, and it is imagined here that some of these categories are preferred over others depending on the condition of the person obligated or the intent of the law .