He has knowledge of the words of God, His servants, so if he speaks to him in the formal veil in the tongue of a prophet or of the world, God willing, understanding may accompany him or it may be delayed. This is the difference between them. As for the tangible provisions, he has no ruling on them except in the remnant of God. So whoever eats what departs from this remnant will not He eats from the hand of this just Imam, and there is no name for God’s sustenance in relation to the believers except the remnant of God, and every sustenance in the universe is from the remnant of God, and all that remains is to differentiate between them. This is because all the wealth in the world is not devoid of either having a specific owner or not having an owner. If it has a specific owner, it is from the baqiyyat of God for this person, and if it does not have a specific owner, it is for all Muslims, so God made a representative for them, this imam, to protect them. This is from the baqiyyat o

Know this, people are in two situations: forced and not forced. In the case of necessity, he permits as much as is needed at the time and the prohibition rule is lifted from him. If he obtains what removes it with it, the prohibition rule prevails over him. If the person forced to dispose of what is someone else’s property, he disposes of it by virtue of a guarantee in a statement and without a guarantee in a statement. If he finds his payment with the one who said it as a guarantee, and if he does not find it, then the Imam of the time will take care of that from the treasury of money, and if the person disposing of it has disposed of what no one owns, or the Imam owns it by virtue of an absolute agency from God for him, then there is nothing on him, whether there is a guarantee or anything else, and this is knowledge that must be known. It is necessary for the Imam of the time, so no one of those charged has acted in the legitimate manner except in the matter of the remnant of G