Know this, people are in two situations: forced and not forced. In the case of necessity, he permits as much as is needed at the time and the prohibition rule is lifted from him. If he obtains what removes it with it, the prohibition rule prevails over him. If the person forced to dispose of what is someone else’s property, he disposes of it by virtue of a guarantee in a statement and without a guarantee in a statement. If he finds his payment with the one who said it as a guarantee, and if he does not find it, then the Imam of the time will take care of that from the treasury of money, and if the person disposing of it has disposed of what no one owns, or the Imam owns it by virtue of an absolute agency from God for him, then there is nothing on him, whether there is a guarantee or anything else, and this is knowledge that must be known. It is necessary for the Imam of the time, so no one of those charged has acted in the legitimate manner except in the matter of the remnant of G