In knowing the position of the traitor

And to me, my heartfelt with abandonment *** is more delicious than an embrace with connection

For in connection I am a slave to myself *** and in abandonment I am a slave to the one who follows

And my preoccupation with my beloved in every way *** is more beloved to me than my preoccupation with my own condition < / p>

In this poetry, he gives preference to his beloved deeds, and it includes what we referred to in our speech before it. As for our saying that the beloved is the attribute of the lover in what we mentioned, it is the Almighty’s saying, “If you love him, you are his hearing and his sight.”

So He made the servant’s hearing and his sight his essence, so he proved that it is his attribute, so what The lover loves distance except with his beloved, and this is the ultimate connection in the essence of distance.

( platform and magazine )

He described the lover as being afraid of abandoning what is sacred in performing service.

This is because only an average knower who has not attained the attainment of knowledge is afraid of this, but he feels it with no taste other than the taste of feeling, and he is a lover, and the lover is obedient to his beloved in all his commands and fulfillment. The matter gives that the commander is the same as the commanded and the lover is the same as the beloved, except that the apparent appears according to what the reality of the appearance gives it, and with appearances the diversities appear in the apparent, and the rulings and names differ, and by them the obedient and the disobedient are revealed. For he who is in the position of feeling and has not attained the limit of placing things in their positions in the apparent is afraid that something will come from him. He contradicts the sanctity in his service when he says that there is no one but Him, as is the view of the one

( platform and magazine )

The lover is described as being independent of a lot of himself for the sake of his Lord.

And a little of his beloved being a lot of things. This is because he differentiates between being a lover because of what he sees in himself of brokenness, humiliation, astonishment, and confusion, which is the effect of love on lovers, and he sees the chivalry of the beloved, his lostness, his leadership, and his admiration for him. He sees that if he gives him everything he owns, it is little for what he gave of himself, and that the right of his beloved is greater to him than the right of himself. Rather, he does not see himself as a right, even though in reality he is only seeking what is right for himself. This is how love gives him. Some kings had a king whom he loved, whose name was Iyas, and some kings entered the king. He sat with him and saw the feet of the slave in the king’s lap and the king pressing them, so he was amazed. Iyas said, “Oh, what are these? Iyas’ feet. These a

( platform and magazine )

The description of a lover embraces obedience to his beloved and avoids disobeying him.

Their poet said.

You disobey God while you show His love*** This is impossible in The analogy is wonderful.

If your love were sincere, you would obey him. *** The lover is obedient to the one who loves.

< p>

The lover is a slave, and the slave whoever abides by the commands of his master and avoids violating his commands and prohibitions will not be seen where he forbade him, nor will he lose him where he commanded.