
He guided all of mankind, so the ruling on this will in this world was by obligation, but in the Hereafter the ruling is based on His saying, “He does what He wants.” Who can prove that he did not want anything but eternal torment upon the people of Hell, and it must be upon one person in the entire world so that the ruling on the name “the tormentor,” “the affliction,” “the avenger” and its likes is correct, and the name The one who is afflicted and like him is a relation and an addition, there is no existent entity, and how can the existent entity be under the rule of what does not exist? So all that was mentioned of his saying, “If He wills, and if We will,” for the sake of this principle, then He has absolutes, and there is a text that returns to it that does not touch upon the possibility of the perpetuation of torment as we have of the perpetuation of bliss, so nothing remains except Permissibility, and that He is Most Merciful in this world and the Hereafter, so if you understa