As for the one who dislikes it for a young man, he considers it to be the beginner on the path. He permits it for the old man and considers it to be the end, for the one who has finished does not ask to return from watching to speech, so he abandons watching and accepts the nonsense, since the nonsense is not valid except with the veil, as he said, and it is not for a human being that God should speak to him except through revelation or from behind a veil. And the finished one knows that, but does not do it. As for the beginner, who is the youth, he has no experience with the stations, for he is in the station of conduct, and he knows nothing of them except what he has tasted. The end is only in watching, and he hears about it from the great ones, so he imagines that he does not lose watching with speech. And the beginner is in an ideal viewing, so he is told, “The matter is not as you claim.” If he spoke to you, he did not bear witness to you, and if he made you bear witness, he

Who says that it breaks the fast, and abstaining from it is obligatory? Who says that it does not break the fast, but it is disliked for the fasting person? And who says that it is not disliked for the fasting person and does not break the fast.

The life-giving noun refers to the noun Ramadan when it refers to one who is fasting during the month of Ramadan, or to the noun “al-Muslim” which causes the heavens and the earth to pass away, or the sky to fall to the earth, since the natural life in bodies is the blood vapor that is generated from cooking. The liver, which is the house of blood for the body, then water flows through the veins in the Tuareg to irrigate the orchard to give life to the trees. If it becomes silted, there is the fear that its action will be reflected in the body, so it comes out by bloodletting or cupping so that as much of it remains as there is life in it. For this reason we made the ruling for the life-giving name or the one who catches it, for with life the heavens of souls and the earth are preserved. Bodies, and with it, the rule of the Life-Giver is stronger than what is by itself. They are two divine names, brothers. So if they come to the name of God, Ramadan, in the rule of the fasting

Whoever says that it is disliked and does not break the fast, his reason for its dislike is based on the fact that the fasting person is described as abstaining from food, because he is forbidden from eating and drinking, and food is the reason for life for the fasting person, and he was commanded to leave it when he fasts and removes the blood. In this case, he only uses cupping for fear of death, so he took the place of lunch in order to seek life, which is He is forbidden from eating food, so he thought that, and with this consideration and the one before it, the ruling is regarding the one who said that it breaks the fast and abstaining from it is obligatory .

Whoever says regarding someone who is overcome by vomiting that it does not break the fast, and they are the majority, and whoever says that it breaks the fast while he is Rabi’ah and those who follow him, and likewise vomiting, the group holds that it breaks the fast, except for Tawoos, for he said that it does not break the fast

The stomach is the storehouse of food from which natural life is created, and the preservation of dominion over the rational soul, through which it is called kingship. With its presence, the benefits of bestowed and acquired sciences are obtained. The rational soul takes into account nature, and nature, even if it is the servant of the body, knows as much as the rational soul that is in the dominion takes into account it. So if nature saw that there was something in the stomach’s closet that would lead to the corruption of this body, it would say to the pushing force, “Take out the excess that was destroyed by remaining in this closet.” So the pushing force took it from the catch, opened the door for it, and took it out, and this is the one who was overcome by vomiting.

Whoever takes into account the fact that it was food and leaves on the road from which he entered intentionally, he is called because of his passage on that road. If he enters breaking the fast, he also breaks his fast by leaving, and whoever distinguishes between the ruling on entering and the ruling on exiting and does not take into account the route, and they are opposites, he says that he does not break the fast, and this is what the throwing threw away. - If the fasting person has something to do in expelling it, which is to vomit, then he takes into account the existence of benefit and avoiding harm for the survival of this structure, then it takes the place of food for him, and the fasting person is prohibited from using food while he is fasting, and expelling it so that there is in the body what is needed for food, he said that it breaks the fast, and whoever differentiates between the ruling on entering and the ruling on exiting, he said. It does not break the fast

And all of this is in divine consideration, the rulings on the divine names that are required by the body’s readiness to be affected by them at all times, for the body is not devoid of the ruling of a divine name in it, so if the place is prepared to seek a divine name