Whoever says that it is disliked and does not break the fast, his reason for its dislike is based on the fact that the fasting person is described as abstaining from food, because he is forbidden from eating and drinking, and food is the reason for life for the fasting person, and he was commanded to leave it when he fasts and removes the blood. In this case, he only uses cupping for fear of death, so he took the place of lunch in order to seek life, which is He is forbidden from eating food, so he thought that, and with this consideration and the one before it, the ruling is regarding the one who said that it breaks the fast and abstaining from it is obligatory .