Not on what they witness, so they deny the indefinite article and know knowledge, since existence is based on knowledge, which is the basis. When proverbs and similes came, the indefinite article appeared, so we lacked the appositive, the adjective, and the conjunction of the statement. If it were not for the proverbs and the indefinite article, we would not need anything, and the intrinsic limits of things are not stronger than the power of the adjectives. The subjective limits, for example, for a human being as a human being do not distinguish Zayd from Amr, so there must be an addition that defines this indefinite article. If you say, “A person came to me who did not know who he was,” until you say “so-and-so.” If he was in the presence of the indefinite article, I called him, or replaced him, or defined him with a conjunction of the statement until you evaluate him in the presence of the definition. So that the one who informs him may know who you want, and this is a position

No one knows it except the people of vision, neither the people of witnessing nor anyone else, and it does not know by news, but it is learned with necessary knowledge that God gives to whomsoever He wishes of His servants. It is not connected to the divine news, and there is a matter that is not perceived in terms of the divine news except this, and anything other than this is not known except by the divine news. Or necessary knowledge and nothing else. The limits of existing beings, regardless of their differences, are the limits of possible things in terms of their rulings in the existential eye, and the subjective limit of the existential eye is nothing but the essence of its existence, so its existence is the essence of its reality, since there is no known existence at all, and the goal of the knowers is to make the limits of the entire universe the subjective limit of the necessary existence, and the scholars of God are above. This revelation and sighting is as we mentioned