and what it gives of the breath of the world and its confinement to four realities and their separation and coming together and its direction on finding the neglected eye from the letters and finding the Pleiades from the preordained homes

Know that nature is in the third place with us from the existence of the first mind, and it is intelligible in existence, without the eye existing. So the meaning of our saying is “created,” that is, “destined,” because creation is estimation, and what is necessary from the estimation of a thing is its existence, the poet said.

And because you renounce what you have created *** and some people create and then do not renounce it .

It is from the threefold because it is intended to praise, and it is not from the fourfold, for the fourfold is only said in the context of slander and satire, so what is all? Whoever decrees something, creates it, and from this divine truth, the theoretical existence of the scholars appears to be the imposition of the impossible in the sciences. He decrees what is not true to exist, and he may decree what is true to exist and does not exist. This is also what this Arab said. Some people promise

As for what you give from the breaths of the world, it is what life occurs in natural bodies of growth and sensation and nothing else, and every breath other than this is not of nature, rather its cause is something else, and it is the rational life, the life of knowledge, which is the eye of the divine light and the merciful soul. Then you should know that the name The soul of this existential reality does not exist unless it belongs to the Most Merciful and the divine names similar to it, and it may be a reality for other names that require the opposite, and in that case it is not a soul of catharsis in the right of that being from Him. And if it is a reality, then it being a soul is a special consideration in which the catharsis occurs either in the right of the one who God relieves the beings of whatever distress and embarrassment they find, or in the right of the One whom He describes in terms of the influence of His will. However, if one does not look from this perspective,