As for the prophets who have the laws, it is necessary for the spirits to descend upon their hearts with commands and prohibitions, and anything other than the commands and prohibitions they send down, such as divine knowledge and information about beings and unseen matters, this is outside the prophecy of the laws, and it is one of the conditions of the prophets in general, and the one who is innovator receives it < /p >

If a ruling from the people of absolute prophethood appears from the rulings apparent from the prophets of the Sharia, such as killing, taking money, or doing any of the actions that contradict the ruling of the established Sharia of the time, then know that this Prophet, who has no Shariah, is not from the Shariah that was revealed to him and he was addressed by it, but rather he is still a follower. For a Messenger who had prescribed for him what he had prescribed, but it was agreed that he was told to follow the law of a Messenger who had prescribed for him what had not been prescribed for another Messenger, and his ruling against this Messenger contradicts the ruling of the other Messenger, so if this person who is of this status met with a Messenger of the Messengers, such as Al-Khidr with Moses, peace be upon him, then he was ruled to be killed. The boy, according to what he ruled and Moses denounced for killing a pure soul according to the apparent meaning of the law, witho

If it is said that this is permissible in the time of the existence of the messengers and today, then only one has legislated. Is it conceivable that the prophets of the saints would rule in a way that contradicts the law of Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace? We said, “No, yes.” As for our saying, “No,” it is not permissible for him to rule according to his opinion. As for our saying, “Yes,” it is permissible for Al-Shafi’i to He rules in a way that contradicts the Hanafi ruling, and both of them were legislated by Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him. He decided on the two rulings, so his law contradicted his law. If it happened that you would inform the prophets of the saints about what the truth taught them of the rulings of the law of the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, or they would witness the Messenger, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, and he would inform them of the ruling on a matter that he saw in disagreement

The hadith scholars do not have this rank. Rather, their rank is nothing other than hadith. They are observers of everything, taking from the essence of everything that everything is apparent and true. However, they do not transgress the limits of God in general. If something appears from them that appears to be transgression. A limit of God’s limits, so that limit is, in relation to you, a limit, and in relation to him, it is permissible and there is no sin in it, and you do not know, and he is upon clear proof from his Lord about that. So what he did forbidden from this is his description, then he is one of those who were told to do whatever you want, so he did nothing but what was permitted for him to do, for it is a command that is not permitted. On the side of the threat, such as his saying, “Do whatever you want. Indeed, He sees what you do.” This is a warning, but our saying is about someone who is told, “Do whatever you want. ”