A just man, a young man who grew up worshiping God, a man whose heart was attached to the mosques, two men who loved each other for the sake of God, who came together for him and separated for him, a man who was invited by a woman of position and beauty, and he said, “I fear God,” and a man who gave charity and hid it so that his left hand would not know what his right hand was spending, and a man He remembered God in silence, and his eyes filled with tears.

Among the servants of God is one who reveals to him what is in his hand of sustenance and it belongs to him. It is so-and-so and so-and-so, and he sees the names of his companions on it, but on his hand. So if he gives someone of this description of his as a charity, is it written as a charity for him? We said, yes, a charity is written for him in terms of what God has attributed to him, even if It is a scrap, so that scrap is not disgraced in it. Do you not see that the dying person has lost the name of ownership and is forbidden from disposing of it, and only a third of it is permitted to him and above that, so no words can be heard about it because he spoke about what he does not own ?

And know that the soul is predisposed to miserliness. God Almighty said: And when good touches it in various ways, He says: And who can be saved from his own miserliness? The reason for that is that it is possible, and every possible thing is poor in authenticity to a likely factor for which its existence is more likely than its nonexistence. So the need for it is subjective, and the human being, as long as his life is connected to his body, his need is between his eyes and his poverty. He is attested, and the accursed one will come to him in his promise. Then Satan said, “Poverty promises you. Neither he nor Satan can overcome himself, except the one who is strong with divine success, for he fights himself and Satan who helps him against him. That is why the Lawgiver called it charity because it comes out of severity and strength.” It is said, “spear of truthfulness,” meaning strong and strong. If he did not hope to survive and was certain of separation, it would be easy for him.

The knower, God says to him, “This is your property,” and he accepts it from him with politeness and knowledge in that it is the property of entitlement to the one who deserves it and who is entitled to it, and the property of trust for the one who has a trust in his hand, and the property of existence for the one for whom it exists. All things belong to God, my being, and they belong to the servant according to the situation, so what he must have. In the same matter, it is of benefit to the soul, it is a possession that is due to him, and it is food and drink that which he is nourished with while he is nourished with, from what he is nourished with, not from what he prefers, and which goes out of his way and other than you, and of clothing that protects him from the heat and cold of the air, and as for anything other than this amount, it is in his hand a possession. A trust for the one who pays with it also what he paid with for himself, from what we mentioned .

The knower is not alone in either being one of those who discovered the names of the owners of things written on them, then he holds them for them until he pays them to them at the time that the Wise One has determined and appointed. Then he differentiates between what is his and calls it a property of entitlement because his name is on it and he is entitled to it, and what is the property of someone else, so he calls it a property of trust because the name Its owner is upon him, and everything according to the language of Sharia belongs to him in the apparent ruling, or this knower is one of those to whom this was not revealed, so he does not know by definition what his provision is from what he has, and if it is revealed, he acts according to what is revealed, for the ruling is for knowledge in that, and if he does not reveal it, it is better for him to fork out all of his money. It is charity for God and His provision must come to him with confidence in what is with God, if he

The person who discloses all of his money may withdraw from revealing it because he sees the name of another person on it, so he is not entitled to anything from it. Thus, he is similar to the person who gives away all of his money without revealing it. If he does not have trust in God, then the law will condemn him if he leaves all his money, and after that he asks people for charity. Such a person’s charity will not be accepted, as

It was mentioned in the hadith of Al-Nasa’i about the man who gave him two garments in charity, then another man came asking to give him charity as well, and this first person who gave charity gave him one