Is it imposed by accident or diligence? I mean injury to the eye or the side. According to the one who made the eye obligatory, there is someone who says that the duty is the eye and who says that the duty is the side and by the side I say no by the eye, for there is difficulty in that, and God says, And He has not placed upon you any hardship in religion, and I mean by the side if it is absent. The Kaaba is out of sight and the long row is valid. Their prayer is valid, with the certainty that all of them did not face the eye. This is reasonable.

The consideration of determining the direction of the qiblah is to remove the servant from his choice, for its origin and the origin of everything other than God is compulsion and compulsion, even the choice of the servant is forced in his choice, and although God is a choosing agent, this is for the sake of His saying, and He chooses, and His saying, “Even if we wish,” and He does only what He has previously known, and knowledge is changed. It is impossible for God Almighty to say, “The word I have cannot be changed, and I am not unjust to my servants.” And He said, “To God belongs the decisive proof,” and I have not seen anyone take heed of this divine saying, for its meaning is extremely clear, and for the sake of its clarity, it is hidden. We have drawn attention to it in this book and explained it, for it is the secret of destiny. Whoever considers this issue will not object to God in Everything that He decrees and performs upon His servants and among them and from them, and

Then we return to considering what we were talking about, and we say that prayer is an entry into the truth. It is stated in the authentic report that prayer is light, and man has sight in his interior as he is in his exterior, so he must reveal himself in his prayer. Among the things he reveals in his prayer is that he is forced to make his choice, which Attributing it to him, so in this place and in all acts of worship, it is prescribed for him to determine things so that his actions are based on necessity, and it is a principle that includes every existing thing, and there is no circumstantial existing thing, from an existing thing to someone who has keen eyesight and listens and is a witness, even in the ruling of what is permissible, he does not choose, because it is impossible for him to He is judged by a ruling other than permissibility, whether obligatory, recommended, prohibited, or disliked.

For this reason, it is prescribed for him to face the house if he sees it when he prays, and to face his direction if he is absent from it, and his obligation in his ijtihad in absence is to fulfill the ijtihad and not to harm the eye. That is, if his obligation is to harm the eye, then the servant is commanded to face his Lord with his heart in his prayer, and indeed in all his movements and stillness, he sees no one but Allah. We have learned that the essence of truth and its essence are impossible for a created being to know, so it is impossible to receive the essence of his essence with his heart, that is, it is impossible for the rational person to know his Lord from the point of view of his essence. Rather, he knows Him from the point of view of the possible in that he lacks it and is distinguished from it in that he is not characterized by the attributes of newly created things in the way that the created possible is characterized because There is nothing like him, so he ca

The injury is the injury of diligence, not the injury to the eye, and that is why the diligent person is rewarded in every situation, especially diligence in our doctrine of principles as it is in the branches of rulings, there is no difference. As for

the saying of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, regarding the diligent person, he is right and wrong.

So what we mean in this issue and others like it is that the jurist regarding injury, what is injury to the eye or injury to the direction, is that the correct person is the one who says injury to the direction, and the one who is wrong is the one who says injury to the eye, since injury to the direction in other than the clouds accumulating day or night in the prairie does not occur. Except by virtue of agreement, then it is more likely to hit the eye, not by virtue of science, and we do not worship God by meteorology or by geometry that predicts meteorology from which the lengths and bre