Its people, there is no doubt that he has wronged it. Whoever sees that this action has atonement, then his atonement is to see who has the qualifications for knowledge of the religious sciences that are beneficial to God, and he is thirsty for that, and he takes the initiative of himself to teach it and quench the produce of his thirst, so he puts it in its place and with its people, and that will be atonement for what he neglected. The first is that whoever does not see any expiation for that, he says he should repent and ask God for forgiveness, and he does not have to ask someone else to teach him about expiation.

Sharia scholars differed regarding the purification of the woman who is experiencing menstruation, as to what is the ruling on it. Some say that she only has to purify herself once if she knows that her menstruation has ended, and she does not have to do anything, no ablution or washing, and her ruling is the same as the ruling on a non-menstrual woman, and I say that, and another group of those who say that she only has to do it. One purification: She must perform ablution for every prayer, which is more prudent. Whoever says that she should perform ablution for every prayer, and who says that she combines the two prayers with one washing.

In our doctrine, the woman who is suffering from istihaadah is not purified, just because she is suffering from istihaadah. Likewise, the soul is if it lies for a legitimate interest in which Sharia obliges it to lie or permits it. Rather, it is sinful if it tells the truth in that case, so there is no repentance for that lie. Just as the blood of istihaadah is not It is the same as menstrual blood, even if they share the doll and the place. Likewise, the lawful lie that is permissible and permissible is not the same as the forbidden lie that occurs from it, even if they share in it being a lie, which is the news of something that is not the matter in itself. Whoever sees repentance from the fact that calling it a lie is true, even if it is permissible or obligatory, like Habib Al-Ajami in His conversation with Al-Hasan Al-Basri when Al-Hajjaj asked him to be killed, and the story is well-known, he said by repenting from it, just as he said by washing the woman with menstruati

It is not impossible to teach someone who learns from him that he does not lie except for a legitimate reason and a legitimate reason, for that does not discredit his justice, but rather it is an evidence of his justice, and something like this has happened among the most noble and perfect men

Tayammum is intended for good land. That land is what is called land, whether it is dirt, sand, stone, or arsenic. If anything of all of this and the like separates from the earth, it is not permissible to perform dry ablution with anything that leaves the earth except dirt, especially because of the text’s mention of it and the earth. Whether he left the earth or not

The intention is towards the earth from its being submissive, and it is the aim towards slavery in general, because slavery is humiliation and worship from it, so the purity of the slave is only by fulfilling what the slave must be of humility and poverty, and standing by his master’s decrees and limits, and obeying his orders. He has separated his sight from his being earth, so he cannot perform tayammum except with dust, because from the dust he created those of us whose children, and with what remains of poverty and destitution in him, according to the Arabs’ saying, “A man’s hand is dusted when he becomes poor.” Then, dust is below the elements, so the servant stands with his reality in terms of his origin, purifying him from every event that takes him out of This position and this can only be achieved without the existence of water and water is knowledge, for knowledge is the life of hearts just as water is the life of the earth, so it is as if it

The scholars agreed in the Sharia that tayammum is a substitute for the minor purity, but they differed regarding the major purity, and we do not say that it is a substitute for anything. Rather, we say that it is a legitimate purity specific to the conditions considered by the Sharia, for there is no law reported from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, nor from the Mighty Book that tayammum Instead, there is no difference between tayammum and every lawful purity. Rather, we said it is lawful because it is not a linguistic purity, and it will come.