With it for His servants, and from this reality that He is in Himself, He mentioned to us in our creation after we were settled and modified in any form that He wished. He created us, just as He is in any form that He wished that He manifested Himself to His servants. Here is a divine secret that He alerted you to so that you may know Him by it, so the owner of this doctrine exalted it in its appearance out of the desire for continuity. Manifesting yourself in that image by residing in it in your eye, so understand. This is the inner ruling in determining the place.

Know that those who advocate wiping over the socks agree on wiping over them without a doubt, but they differed regarding wiping over the unfairness. Some say that it is absolutely forbidden, some say that it is absolutely permissible, and some say that it is permissible if it is in a special way. As for if it is of such density and thickness that no water reaches it. The wiping cloth covers the leg or it is lined with leather and it is permissible to walk in it, meaning it is possible to walk in it.

As for the internal ruling on that, it was presented in fear and the ruling on the sock remains. What is established is that the sock is like the slipper in its veiling characteristic, for the servant is a veil to the exclusion of his Creator. This is why it has been stated that whoever knows himself knows his Lord, for it is the evidence of Him, the evidence and the signified, and if they are connected in the specific way, they are two opposites that do not come together .

/p>

We have said above that the shoe is more indicative of the man in removing participation from the word “man” that applies to him, as well as jogging, and that has already happened, except that the sock, even if it covers the man, does not strengthen the force of the shoe to penetrate it, as water penetrates and penetrates his pores quickly, but the shoe is not like that, and the ruling on it. Inwardly, among the servants of God, whoever is stronger in indicating God than others is in the position of a sock, as has been proven in the narrations on the authority of God regarding the description of God’s saints.

More than one person narrated to me on the authority of someone who narrated it, informing the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, that he It was said to the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, “O Messenger of God, one of God’s saints.” Then the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said: Those who, when they se

If the slippers are lined with skin, then he is the one to be blamed who hides himself and his situation with God from the underworld, lest they realize the rank of his guardianship with God, just as a sock hides from the ground, lest it catches up with him and infects him with the skin that has prevented the earth from the underworld, and this is the characteristic by which this blamer hides from the permissible things from the world. The lower, veiled, they did not recognize from him except that characteristic by which he was not distinguished from the generality of believers, and he is behind that characteristic in the position of guardianship with God, and the top of the sock remained on the side of the upper with God, Glory be to Him, without any barrier between him and his Lord Almighty .

I have opened for you the door of legal consideration, which is the permissibility from the image whose ruling appears in the senses to what suits it in your self or in the aspect of the truth, which indicates the truth. This is the meaning of consideration, for whoever crossed the valley if you cut it and cut it off

Those who say that wiping is permissible are unanimously agreed on the permissibility of wiping over proper socks, and they differed regarding the breach. Some say that it is permissible if the breach is slight without a limit, some say that the light breach is limited to three fingers, and some say it is permissible as long as the name of the sock is given to it, even if its hole is large, which is more correct in my opinion. Someone says that it is forbidden to wipe if the breach is in the front of the socks, even if it is minor. What I say is that this issue has no basis and no text about it in the Book or the Sunnah, so it would be better to neglect it and not to work with it, and that is the right thing to do, since there has been some disagreement about it among Sharia scholars. We are in need of talking about it, and the truth about that with us is only with those who said it is permissible as long as it is called “khof”

Which is to say that the sock is called a “shoe” because it covers the man completely, so if it breaks and something appears on the leg, he wipes over what is visible of it and wipes over the sock, and that is since it is called a sock, this condition must be fulfilled, and there is a wondrous secret for the discerning and correct person. The sock is what is hidden. It also appears that Imru' al-Qais said ,

Hide them from their tunnels,

That is, make them appear and show them .

But we said to wipe what appears because we have been commanded in the Book of God to wipe the feet, and if they appear, we wipe them. As for what is hidden, the apparent meaning of the Sharia is a cover-up of the truth of the ruling of monotheism by attributing everything to God. Purity in the Sharia is related, which is that it should be accompanied by monotheism by seeing it as the rule of God in His creation. Creature rule is not the same as government policies.