To be attributed only to God, and servitude is an attribute of the servant. So whoever witnesses his servitude is one who witnesses it. This is why the servants of God are attributed to servitude and not to servitude. They are servants of God without any attribution, unlike their attribution to servitude, for the truth does not accept the attribution of servitude because it is the specification of the attribute of the servant, not the specification of the servant. He saw servitude, but he did not see his being a servant of God. So there is a difference between what is attributed to the attribute and what is attributed to God. The people of the tongue said, “A man is between privacy and specificity, and between servitude and servitude, and servitude is related to it, and servitude is related to the master.” As for the statement of those who said the difference is proof of creation, it is as previously mentioned in the meaning of their statement, a reference to Creation without righ

The meaning of control among the people is to act to show privacy with a simple tongue in supplication, and this is a kind of superfluity and is close to it because it is imagined that the soul enters into it, unless it is from a divine command, in which the person who does it is not held accountable.

Deaf men have no discerning eyes. *** Those who are chosen for him have ruling souls.

Rather, they are slaves who are still submissive *** In any case, martyrdom is permanent

Control over The veil is its place *** behind the curtains, the dark messengers

If it is about a divine command by definition, then the human being is a slave who complies with his master’s command in a way that is obligatory. If the essence of control is offered to