So the one who said this statement has no luck in manhood, and so does the other saying: I am jealous of that beauty that is beyond the sight of someone like me. Oh, I wish I had my hair. What kind of sight do you have? And where is the existent who has a sight of his own? Is anyone but him looking at it? O polytheist, are you not ashamed to say something like this? Jealousy of the truth is that it be a truth, and you attribute it to the truth, so you see what the jealousy of it is, and you are like that. However, in every way, it requires proving the other, distinguishing between things, and distinguishing, so you are protected in that from proving the existence of an extra eye, or from denying many eyes in the absence of my eye, so prove the multiplicity. In steadfastness and its absence from existence, and I affirm unity in existence and its absence from steadfastness, so know that.

If the boy's condition is the same*** then he is free, and if not

And if what did not exist, it would not exist *** with its universes, a being that resides

Then the freedom of the slave is invalid *** and there is no slavery except for the one who says, “Be.”

O free man, do not lack *** for your protection from poverty has weakened

And it is necessary, so what do you see? ***And it is necessary for you, for the time has come when

He added his wealth to our poverty*** To me, this is one of the strongest of the jinn.

Know that freedom according to the sect is total enslavement in all aspects, so you are free from everything other than God, and with us it is the removal of the attribute of a slave with the attribute of the Truth, if the Truth is his hearing, his sight, and all his faculties, and he is not a slave except with these qualities that the Truth has removed, with his existence, with the essence of this being proven. The person and the right cannot be owned, so this object is free, as it has no meaning from its essence unless it is described by these qualities, which are the truth itself, not the attributes of the right itself, so the person’s essence is confirmed by the presence of the pronoun in

His saying, “I was hearing it”

This is the same distraction, and the attribute is the essence of the truth, not its essence, so freedom is established for this person, so he is subject to the rulings of these attributes, which are the essence of the truth, not anything else,

And know that the free one is the one who has control over matters in their crisis, and you did not control it, and he directed it and you did not control it, and this does not exist in the two sides, for God says, “Call upon Me, I will respond to you.” And He asked us to respond when He called us, so the direction occurred on the part of the Truth and on the side of the servant. If it were not for the servant’s supplication and his question, the Truth would not have answered, and the answer is His attribute. A form of acting in the truth has appeared from the servant, and a form of acting in the servant has appeared from the truth, not a form of acting. This destiny is between the right and the servant, and he cannot be completely free from this description of him. In fact, freedom does not have an essence, for additions prevent that, but the reality of freedom lies in the self’s absence of the worlds. With the world appearing to Him for its own sake and not for any other reason,