Despite this, we have decided that names are a relation, so what is the relation of this first name and no trace of it that requires it? We said: As for the relation that necessitated this name for it, it is known, and that is that corresponding to its existence are fixed entities that do not exist except by benefiting from the existence of truth, so its manifestations are in That is the description of existence, and they are objects for their own sake. They are not objects for a reason or a cause, just as the existence of the truth is for its own sake, not for a reason. And just as God Almighty is All-Sufficient in absolute terms, the poverty of these entities in general is due to this necessary All-Sufficient One who is All-Sufficient in Himself for His own sake. And these objects, even if they are of this type, some of them are examples and non-examples that are distinguished by something. And it is not distinguished by something in which participation occurs, so the name of th