And from that is the secret of why men choose to leave out what is permissible from Chapter 9 and < The forbidden is replaced if it is permissible and what is permissible is forbidden if it is in what is forbidden. Men do not leave out what is permissible except because it comes under the rulings, except what is necessary for the establishment of these objects: what is permissible is between and what is forbidden is between and what is in between. He has appointed them, so if the evident were removed, the rulings would be removed from the evident, if the principles are fulfilled, then asceticism is only in curiosity, and as for what they call to need, then that is what is relied upon and it is not valid to abstract from it, for the nourishment of the monotheist in monotheism is like nourishing existence with the existing, limit with the limited, number with the counted, and witnesses with the witnessed, so the cause does not rise and the proportions do not flow away.