The letters that have these vowels verbally and in writing, see it there, and they have modals, adverbs, and positions, just as the letters had. We will mention them in the book of principles, which is specific to the science of letters, God willing, and just as coloring and empowerment have been proven for the self, so it has been proven for the hadith and the link, but in the nominative and accusative, deleting the description, and deleting the drawing, and there is coloring. Constructing the link for two things by agreement, metaphor, and necessity. Then by agreement, which is the following. This is Ibnam, and I saw Ibnama, and I was amazed by Ibnam. By metaphor, the movement of transmission is like the movement of the signifier. He who has succeeded in reading from the one who transmitted, and by necessity, the movement is to meet the two consonants. The movement of following may be the agreement in self-composition, even if the origin of all the letters is empowerment, which

As for us, we do not say the words of Abu Talib and limit ourselves, nor do we say the words of the other and limit ourselves, for each one of them said a truth in some sense and did not complete it. So I say that the first divine truths are directed to the upper spheres in the way in which they are directed to the places of their traces according to other than Abu Talib al-Makki, and every truth is accepted. According to their rank, and since these spheres of gentleness were closer, according to other than Abu Talib, to the truths, their acceptance was more prior to the absence of work and the purity of the place than the turmoil of relations, for it is pure. For this reason, he made them the effective cause, even if this speaker knew that those first truths were directed to what suits them in gentleness, which is the human breath, so he moved. The upper sphere to which the world of breaths fits, and this is the doctrine of Abu Talib. Then that upper sphere moves the required mem

Then we go back and say that the speaker lacked coloring in order to reach his goal, and he found the world of letters and movements to be receptive to what he wanted from them, knowing that they do not change their state or invalidate their reality. So the speaker imagines that he has changed the letter and what he has changed is proof of that if you stop looking at the Dal of Zayd insofar as he is a Dal. And look at it in terms of its precedence, for example, and it is devoted to it, or any verbal verb that would have been used to speak of it. It is not permissible for you to except the nominative case in it, especially since it is removed from its structure that was found on it. And whoever imagines that the subject’s signifier is the object’s signifier, or the passive signifier, has confused and believes that the first word is ‘ayn. The second is nothing like it, and whoever believes this in existence has fallen far from the truth, and perhaps something will come from this cha