Know that the science of beginning is a dear science and that it is not restricted, and the closest expression to it would be to say that beginning is the opening of the existence of possible things through succession and succession, because the essence that created it required that without being restricted by time, since time is among the totality of physical possible things, so nothing is intelligible except the connection of a possible thing with a necessity for its own sake, so it was. In contrast to the existence of the Truth, there are immutable entities described as eternal nothingness, which is the universe in which there is nothing with God, except that His existence overflowed upon these entities according to what their preparations required, so they were created for their entities, without Him, without any rational or imaginative interface, in which confusion occurred regarding the two paths, from the path of revelation. Through intellectual evidence and articulation of

The reason for the glory of that is ignorance of the first cause, which is the essence of truth, and since it was a cause, it was a god for those who created it, since the one who is created does not know that it is theirs. Among our companions are those who said that the beginning was about the ratio of oppression, and some of our companions said, rather, it was about the ratio of power, and the law says about the ratio of command and specification in A possible eye without any other of the possible things distinguished from Him, and what we have come to know from that, and the prophets agreed with us on it, is that starting from the relation of a matter has the smell of coercion, since the discourse only takes place on a fixed, non-existent, rational, all-hearing, all-knowing eye of what it hears by hearing, which is the hearing of existence, the intellect of existence, and no knowledge of existence. At the time of this speech, she became confused about his existence, so she was

The beginning is a state that is accompanied by an ongoing and uninterrupted state. With this consideration, the given entity is not restricted by the arrangement of the possible things, so the relationship to it is the same. The beginning is still and continues to be, so every thing of the possible things has the essence of priority in the beginning. Then if the possible things are related to one another, progress and backwardness are determined, not in relation to it. Glory be to Him, so the theorists stood with the arrangement of possible things while we stood with attributing them to Him, and the entire world for us has no restriction except by God in particular, and God transcends limit and restriction, so what is restricted by Him is subordinate to Him in this exaltation, so the priority of truth is its priority, since there is no priority for truth to anything other than the world, and it is not valid to attribute it or attribute it to it. Rather, this is the case with all

But if he wanted the beginning, which is for it to appear to him unless it had appeared, it is like His saying, “And We will certainly test you until We know,” which is His saying, “And God will see your deeds,” then the divine ruling will be according to what the condition gives Him. He had decided the matter in a specific state with the condition of permanence for that state in our illusion, so when the present permanence, which is lifted, was lifted. If it lasted, the necessitation of the permanence of that matter would appear from the side of the truth, another ruling was necessitated by the state that began from the universe, so he contrasted the beginning with the beginning. This is the meaning of the knowledge of the beginning for it in the other way. God Almighty said, “And appeared to them from God what they did not expect.”

The Messenger of God says: And peace be upon him, leave me as long as I leave you.

And the laws were revealed according to the exte