You were confined. He is the one who was confined, not the one who was confined. It is said that he did such-and-such to him if he caused the action to happen to him, and if he presented it to the occurrence of that action, it was said that he did, and his example is that Zaid struck Omar if he caused him to be beaten, and Zaid struck Omar if he caused him to hit someone else, and in the tongue. The disease confined him and the enemy confined him to something other than an alif. In illness, he is from the four-fold action, and in the enemy, from the three-fold action. The servant, since the place of the manifestation of divine actions is in him, and what is seen in the senses is only from him, and it cannot be other than that. God attributed the action to the servant and people attributed the action to the created thing, even if He attributed the truth to that. So, the ratio became that makes the action belong to the servant, and the ratio of “asar” makes the action belong

If you do not know things in terms of their facts, you will not know that the world emerged in the image of truth, and the truths in it are linked to divine truths. This is a difficult realization that has many veils that cannot be lifted by thought or revelation. The matter revolves between the effect of truth on creation and creation on truth. God Almighty said, “I will answer.” The call of the supplicant when he supplicates and says, “That is because they followed that which displeased God.” The she-camel has drink, I mean, a righteous she-camel, and you have drink on a known day. He set an example for a people who reason. And none of us has but a known place. So limitation is the generality of existence, so every existent is described by some limitation. Confined from that aspect, and I have shown you what is incapable of It is revealed and there is no evidence, theoretical reason, and God speaks the truth and He guides the path.

A party has previously mentioned the ruling on hunting in this section, and the discussion here is about killing it, not about hunting it in the sanctuary, whether it is permissible, due to His saying, “Do not kill game while you are in the sanctuary of the verse.” It is a decisive verse, and they differed in its details according to their understanding of it. So, from that, is it obligatory? Its value or something like it, so some of them said that what is obligatory is something like it, and some of them said that it is a choice between value and something like it .

Killing the game is a testimony to the game, and it is alive and is alive because it was killed in an unjust transgression in the path of God, since for the sake of God it is forbidden, and the sanctuary is the attribute of the forbidden person and the spot. This is the game that has been transgressed against either by these two characteristics or by one of them. So whoever deliberately kills it while in ihram or in the sanctuary has transgressed against it and returned what he intended with it. Death, even if it is not imposed on the killer, then whoever assaults you, assault him in the same way as he assaulted you. The game is killed, not dead, and the killer is dead, not killed. This is the responsible dead, just as an answer is requested from the deceased in his grave when asked, describing it as death. This is moral death, so he is charged with a penalty similar to that. He killed among the blessings