Who among us says that he remains in the manifestation of the noun in which that meaning appears to him? And among us is he who says that he moves to the noun in which his meaning appears in the implication, for it is more important and more complete. So the man has the choice if he is strong in the conjugation of the adverbs, and if he is under the conjugation of the adverbs, he is in accordance with the case of the noun that decrees. His authority is over him

The jurists agreed that it is obligatory for the unconscious person, but they differed regarding the insane. Some of them made it obligatory to make up for it, and some of them did not make it obligatory, and I say so, and the same applies to me regarding the unconscious person. They differed about the fact that fainting and insanity invalidate the fast. Some say that it invalidates the fast, and some say that it does not invalidate the fast. Some people differentiated between whether he fainted before dawn or after dawn, and some people said that if he fainted after most of the day had passed, that would be sufficient, and if he fainted at the beginning of the day, that would be sufficient .

Fainting is a state of extinction, and insanity is a state of its own, and every one of those who have this characteristic is not obligated, so there is no ruling on him, although the ruling in its origin with us is not conceived in the way, for every time has a coming that belongs to it, so there is no time in which it is the same as the time that passed, so what Time has passed, it has passed as it is, and what we are in is under its authority, and if it does not come, it has no rule over us.

If they say that it may be among the rulings of the current time, which is now, to make up for something that had its performance in the first time, we say to it, then it is a performer, since this is the time of performing what you called a judgement, and if you meant this by it, then a Muslim is on the way, then you called him a judge, and the time of the situation has no news, no. Of what has passed or of what is to come, it exists between two extremes of nothingness, and it has no knowledge of the past, nor of what it brought, nor of what its owner missed .

What the present tense brings may be similar to what the past tense brought in form, not in reality, just as the afternoon prayer in the present tense is similar to the noon prayer, which was in the past time in all its circumstances, even as if it were the same. It is known that the ruling of the afternoon is not the ruling of noon until If we saw a person who performed the prayers at their appointed times and it happened that he forgot the noon prayer or fell asleep until the time for the afternoon prayer came, and we saw him praying four times the noon prayer at that time, and we think that he is praying the afternoon prayer due to the great similarity between them, and this is not the case.

Among the scholars are those who mandated succession in making up the judgment as it was in performance, and among them were those who did not oblige it, and some of them are good, and among them are those who recommended it, and the group is on abandoning its obligation.

If the time enters in the duty extended by time, the first name asks the taxpayer to perform it. If the taxpayer does not do it and delays the act until the end of the time, the other name receives it, then the taxpayer in that act will be a judge with respect to the first name, and if he had done it at the beginning of the time entry, it would have been Performed without income or suspicion, and it was performed with respect to the other name. If the fasting person, the traveler or the sick person breaks his fast, his obligation is only for a number of days other than Ramadan, so it is an obligation of extended time from the second day of Shawwal to the end of his life or to Shaban of that year, so he receives the first name as second. On a day in Shawwal, if he fasts it, he will be fulfilled without any suspicion or interference, and if he delays it until other than that time, he will be fulfilling it from the perspective of a judge, and in succession in that at the beginnin

So whoever takes into account the shortness of hope and ignorance of the term is obligatory, and whoever takes into account the vastness of time is better, and whoever takes precaution is desirable, and each of these conditions has a divine name that does not exceed his ruling on it, for the universe is in the grip of the divine names, and they direct it in two ways according to their facts and according to the universes’ preparations for them. Two things are necessary, which is Two eyes, for the psychological descriptions of names and non-names do not change, so understand that and realize it, and you will be happy, God willing.

The stations that have many different aspects, and the seeker may neglect their ruling in one of the aspects related to them, such as piety, for he has a ruling in many aspects, including food, drink, clothing, taking, looking, listening, striving, touching, and smelling, for Omar bin Al-Khattab brought a catch of the spoils. Before the portion was taken to be offered to him, he held his nose so that he would not get it .