In the secrets of zakat

Combining on this day by advancing the Asr prayer and delaying the Maghrib prayer, so that those who establish the analogy measure the delay for this delay and advance and this advance

[ Every diligent person is obligated to do what his diligence has led to him .]

The Lawgiver has declared the ruling of the Mujtahid to be a legitimate ruling, so the Mujtahid’s proof of analogy is fundamental in Sharia according to what his evidence, consideration, and diligence gave him is a Shari’a ruling that should not be rejected by someone whose doctrine is not Qiyas, and if he does not say it, then the Shari’ah has established it as a ruling in the right of the one who gave it his Ijtihad. He was subjected to a response to it, for he was subjected to a response to a ruling that had been proven by the Lawgiver. Likewise, the author of analogy, if he responded to the ruling of the Zahiri in his adherence to the apparent meaning that his ijtihad had given him, then he had also rejected a ruling that the Lawgiver had established. So every diligent person must abide by what his ijtihad has led him to, and not be exposed to the error of those who disagree with him, for this is bad manners with the Lawgiver. Sharia scholars should not be ill-mannered with Sh

[ The sayings of scholars regarding the form of plurals in travel ]

Those who said differed regarding the form of combining prayers while traveling. Some of them saw that the first prayer should be delayed and prayed with the second, and among them were those who saw that the second prayer should be brought before the first if he wished, and that the first prayer should be delayed until the afterlife if he wished.

[ Consideration in combining advance and delay and both ]

So whoever considers delaying the first, consider it knowledge of God, for by God he was and nothing is with him, and the world is later than the existence of the truth by existence, for his existence is derived from the existence of the truth. So when we wanted to know him from his being a god to the world, we delayed his knowledge until the time of our knowledge of us, so when we knew ourselves, we knew him. Our Lord

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: He who knows himself knows his Lord

So we prayed the first at the time of the second, and whoever took existence into account, put the afterlife before the first and made the existence of the servant’s eye the existence of the truth, so the truth The one who knows God, so his knowledge is from God, and God knows God, and whoever takes both matters into account, he comes forward if he wishes, and he takes another, if he wishes, and for every path there is a sect, and the perfect among

( Season )

One of the chapters that permits gathering is travel

, with agreement among those who say it. They differed regarding gathering in urban areas and the conditions for permissible travel. Some of them made travel itself permissible for gathering, whatever travel it was and in whatever capacity it was, and among them were those who stipulated in it some kind of travel and some type of travel. In the hadith, if he hastened to travel, then he put the reason in the plural of hastening. As for the type, it was mentioned above from traveling to the village, what is permissible, and what is disobedient.

( Taken into account in this )

It is not permissible to combine the two prayers except for what we have mentioned regarding Arafat and combining. As for travel in reality, which is the travel of breaths, it is not permissible to combine it if the combination means taking one of the two prayers out of its time, and what he said in our way, taking into account, except for those who have no knowledge. With taste in that, and if the one who said this statement paid attention to his apparent movements, his sight, his hearing, and his limbs, he would see them changing at all times, and he would not have any information due to his neglect of himself, and for this reason God said to us and in yourselves, “Do you not see? ”

( He arrived at the time of gathering in the city without an excuse )

Ibn Abbas said about the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, joining the two prayers without an excuse, that he wanted not to embarrass his nation, and he agreed with what God Almighty said:

( made )

There is no burden on you in religion, and his saying, peace be upon him, is that the religion of God is easy.

A group of the people of Zahir said this, and others said, “It is not permissible to combine without an excuse that makes it permissible to combine.”

( Considering this )

Plural for the people of the hijab is a kindness to them in the obligation and it is permissible for them to remove the embarrassment, for the embarrassment in worship is the weakening of the obligation, for the work in itself is a cost, so if hardship is added to it, it is an obligation upon an obligation. As for the people of the spectacle, there is no plural for them except the plural and the arafa, and other than those two. No

[ Statements of jurists regarding gathering in urban areas with the excuse of rain ]

Some of them permitted it, whether it was during the day or night, and some of them prohibited it during the day and permitted it at night, and some of them permitted it in the mud but not in the rain at night. What I have come to is that if the praying person’s doctrine is that prayer is not valid except in congregation and he does not have a congregation except in the mosque, then he combines the two prayers at night. And during the day, if he is in a group, and if his doctrine is that it is permissible to perform the unique prayer in the presence of a group, then it is not permissible for him to combine it, not if he is in the mosque, and the imam gathered according to whatever doctrine that imam was, if the imam was a mujtahid and not an imitator, except that today he imitates that mujtahid in all his instances, as they are upon. In general, jurists in our time

( Considering this )

Plural is permissible for a resident, as he is hidden from witnesses of his travel, for he is a traveler in that he does not feel in every breath the difference in conditions, thoughts, self-talk, and movements