The Moroccan Imam stood up and told me to advance for the sake of my knowledge, for the ruling on the first matters is my ruling, so those present said to him, “Speak, be brief, and be the eloquent and miraculous

Then he said: Everything that does not dispense with a matter is governed by the ruling on that matter, but if it is from the world of creation and matter, then the student should look away from it and the researcher should rely on it .

Then he said: Whoever exists is necessary for him, then it is impossible for him to not exist, and the existing would not have been impossible for him to exist, even if non-existence had not been made possible for him due to the presence of the opposite in precedence. If the opposite is not present, then the impotence of the opposite is inherent, and if it were impossible for this other, it is and it is impossible for it to disappear by itself due to the validity of the condition and the rulings. Binding

Then he said, “It is impossible for him to rehabilitate the citizen, because his journey is in the second time of his existence for himself, and he is not a resident. If it were possible for him to move, he would have risen by himself, dispensed with the place, and would not have destroyed it, in contrast to it being described as loss or agent. For your saying is an act, and there is nothing that a rational person would not say . < /p>

Then he said, “Whoever’s existence depends on the annihilation of a thing, then it does not exist until it annihilates. If it exists, then that thing on which it depends has annihilated,” and the meaning is obtained from the precedence of something, for it has been limited to it and restricted, and this description is bound to it, even if it perpetuates, then the entity has been proven with two words . < /p>

Then he said, even if He required the existence of someone else to perform it, that normal would not be based on Him, and its reliance on Him is valid, so it is invalid for His existence to be agreed upon while His creation has restricted it. Then, the description of the description is impossible, so there is no way to this contract under any circumstances .

Then he said, “Even if the ball is perishable, it has no direction. If the directions are towards me, then its rule is against me, and I am outside of it, and it was and I am not, so what is the distraction and trouble?”

Then everyone who settled in a place whose journey was permitted and whose movement from a place was established by himself said something, for the triangulation defines and determines it, and this contradicts what the mind had previously determined .

Then he said, if nothing existed except from independent people in agreement and disagreement, we would not see in existence separation and unity, and the ruling of what is estimated is the ruling of reality, so estimation here for the dispute is not beneficial .

Then he said, if a thing is found in his eye, it is permissible for the one with the eye to see it with his eye restricted to his visible face, eyelid, and so on. Then there is a reason that necessitates seeing in the doctrine of most Ash’arites except existence with structure and without structure, and structure is necessary, and if seeing affects what is seen, we would make it permissible, for the requirements are clear. With its evidence, as we mentioned, then he prayed and greeted after he had praised and sat down, and those present thanked him for his brevity in the phrase and his elaboration of the meanings in the precise reference.

Then Al-Mashriqi stood up and said: The formation of a thing from a thing is an inclination, and its formation, not from a thing, is the power of eternity. And whoever does not withhold from you, your power is effective in him and has not ceased.

Then the ancient said: He does not accept the unexpected, so it does not occur. And if he created in himself something that is not of it, then by the lack of that quality he would be deficient in it, and he whose perfection is proven by reason