It was as it was without specifying, on the condition that it be evidence in the matter itself as evidenced by the senses. If the evidence is tangible, even if the necessary knowledge of the truth of this claim was given in the soul of the judge, then that necessary knowledge would be the same as evidence of the truth of this claimant’s claim, so these indications are valid. He is the one who confirms the one who made this claim, so if he is believed by someone who believes him and knowledge of this occurs in the soul of the one with whom it happened, then that is for the person to whom this evidence was obtained, confirming the one who made this claim, and the confirmation is returned universal, that is, in creation as it is in the truth, so the one who made the claim was between two certifiers, confined from any direction he turned, and he did not find it. Unless he believes what he brought in his claim, then this situation gave him security in himself from being disbelieved fro