Regarding his description of his Lord, God Almighty did not remove his description and gave it to him. Rather, the similarity occurred in both the wording and the meaning for the unverified person, so he says, “This is this,” and we know that this is not this, and this should be for this, and this should not be for this, so let it be with whom it should not be, nakedness and trustworthiness, and this. The shortcomings and words of someone who is blind to the realization of the truths, for this is and must be due to him. This is not the Lord, the servant. And if it is said about God, Glory be to Him, that He is Knowing, and it is said about the servant that He is Knowing, and so are the Living, the Desire, the Hearer, the Seeing, and all other attributes and perceptions. Beware of making the life of the truth the life of the servant in the limit, for you are bound by impossibilities. If the life of the Lord is made according to what divinity deserves, and the life of the servant is made according to what the universe deserves, then the servant should be alive, and if that were not destined for him, it would not be valid for the truth to be commanding or subjugating except for Himself, and God Almighty tolerates that He should be commanded or oppressed, so if it is proven that the commanded and the oppressed are something else. And another eye, so he must be alive, knowledgeable, willing, and capable of what is intended by him. This is how the facts are given. For this there is a letter that only accepts one movement, such as the ha’ of this, and then a letter that accepts two or three movements in terms of his physical and spiritual form, such as the ha in the pronoun for him, for her, and for him.