As for the analogy according to its provers, it is the appearance of a Lord as a servant and the appearance of a servant as a Lord by the command of a Lord. If it is not by the command of a Lord, it is not taken as evidence of a ruling or of a praiseworthy and generous character, for it is also taken as evidence. As for the appearance of a Lord as a desired person, the obligatory command is not required for it, but It may be about a supplication and a request, and its description is the quality of a command, and the meaning is different, even if this one is heard and complied with, and the other is like that, but there are two differences between them. This is the secret rule of analogy in reasoning, which is the analogy of the absent person with the witness, for a reasonable ruling that combines the witness and the absent person and attributes to each one of those attributed to him according to what befits his majesty. Rather, we said by his majesty. Because the sublime is one of