It is not execution, but rather a transition from one state to another. The ability is related to the appearance of the condemned person in the state to which he moved, so the ability created that state for him, so it is only related to his creation. The other matter is that he described it as the ability to go, that is, there is no compulsion on him to keep him in existence, for the existence is the essence of the one who is standing himself. I mean his survival is conditional upon the existence of that condition. Existence remains upon him, and that condition is provided by God at all times. He has the right to prevent the existence of that condition, and there is no survival of the conditioned except through it. So the condition did not exist, so the conditioned did not exist, and this abstinence is not related to ability. He described himself as having the ability to do that, so there is no remaining. Except for the imposition of the dispute that He wants to remain, He is able