He who believes that existence is nothing but the essence of reality, from his essence, causes are not created by him. However, when he appeared in the eyes of those looking at him in various forms, he was judged to be so by the rulings of the essences of possible things. He appeared to be defective by virtue of the accident that was presented, not the eyes of those looking at him, and he in himself is on What it is, just as forms of colors are exposed to the light in the eye of the beholder, while in itself it is not coloured. This is what is correct again and is defective. As for relying on metaphors because they are the most well-known of knowledge, reliance can only be on what is known for the sake of specification. If it were objectionable, it would not be distinguished or identified, so reliance is on what is not supported, and nouns are not. The power of metonymies is strengthened, so the one who relies on metonymies will not be disappointed, and the one who relies on names