If the name “shoes” is removed by cutting, and it does not join the step of the shoe to cover the outer part of the leg, then it is neither a shoe nor a sandal, then it is silent about it, just like someone who walks barefoot, for there is no dispute about the validity of his ihram, and it is silent about it, and everything that the Sharia is silent about is well-being, and the command to cut it came, so it joins what was spoken of with such and such. It is an additional and correct ruling that gives what does not give in general, so it is necessary to adopt it, because he only cut them to join them to the level of the shoe, except that it covered the foot, so it separated from the shoe and did not cover the leg, so it separated from the shoe, so it is neither a shoe nor a shoe, and it is close to the shoe and close to the shoe, and we made it a protection at the top for the presence of wiping. On the top of the sock, if there was no consideration of harm in that in any way, he wo