So who says that if they fast it, then it suffices for them, and who says that it does not suffice for them, and that they are obligated to do a number of other days, and what I go to is that if they fast it, then that does not suffice for them, and that they are obligated to do other days, except that I differentiate between the sick person and the traveler if they fail to fast. In this case, in the month of Ramadan, as for the sick person, fasting is for him a voluntary act, and it is an act of righteousness, and it is not obligatory for him. If he made it obligatory for himself, then it is not obligatory for him. As for the traveler, his fasting while traveling in the month of Ramadan or at any other time is not an act of righteousness, and if it is not an act of righteousness, it is as if he did not work. Something that is the lowest of its degrees, or that it is the opposite of righteousness and its opposite, which is immorality, and I do not say that except that I deny t