And from that is the secret of the change of knowledge due to the change of the ruling from Chapters 1 and <2 . The science of investigation and the science of drawings gave that knowledge changes with the change of the known, and the known does not change except with knowledge. So tell us, how is the ruling? This is an issue in which minds have been confused, and what has been mentioned in it has been narrated. So how can I say the method of evidence that the reason is not It is a defect for the one who is the reason for what came to the one who came from the ambiguity except from attaching the absent person to the witness in the analogy. From the corruption of consideration, your ruling on the absent person is your ruling on the one who is present. For every position, there is an article, and where is the necessary from the possible and the impossible, and where is the state from the impossible. Every eye has a limit for everyone, so do not be deceived by proverbs. It is the eye