The possible exists, so everything remains for you as it has always been, and there is no change in it, and there is no change in existence as an attribute. Existence is existence, non-existence is non-existence, and what is described as existing exists, and what is described as non-existent is non-existent. This is the same people of investigation from the people of revelation and existence.

Then included in this issue is the face that has the front, which is the face that is limited to sight and with it is distinguished from the back. If a person sees from behind him the same as what he sees from in front of him, then it is a whole face without a nape, so his characteristic is not destroyed because he sees from every direction, so it is not destroyed because the eye She preserves it from her perspective. From whatever direction someone who wants to destroy him comes to him, he does not find a way to uncover it, just as the person with a shackled face fears someone who comes to him from his imam. End of part eighty-seven .

Know that facts are not characterized by destruction and the face of a thing is its reality. Rather, things that are incidental to facts are characterized by destruction through their relation to one another. So, I mean the incidental matters, their reality is that they are accidents, so their face does not perish from their being accidents. So it is described by the one to whom a certain relation is presented and then with it that relation is removed. When another ratio occurs, the removal of that accidental ratio is called destruction, and that place to which that accident is attributed is called destruction, and what then is but facts, and then there are only non-perishable faces, and then there is nothing but lineage, and then there is nothing but destruction, so see how you like and pronounce according to what you consider. For this reason, the face has been singled out due to the impossibility of describing it with destruction, as The truth was indestructible

The answer is its beginning is the beginning, which is the meaning existing in the soul of the one who praises, so it must be restricted by means of the meaning that it is the beginning of an event, so it must have a reason, and the reason is the same as the restriction, and by way of pronouncing praise, its beginning is absoluteness, and then after that, if you wish, you may restrict it. In the capacity of a divine act, and if you wish, it is pure in restriction in the capacity of transcendence, and then more than this.

And if the questioner intended by praise, here is the servant, then he designated praise for the Truth with the existence of his essence, so his beginning is the Truth that created Him by what He created. And if by praise and his beginning he meant adding the principle to praise, that is, with what praise begins, then we say by existence, whether happiness is associated with that existing thing or misery, and if by praise he means praise of praise, then his beginning is gifting. And by grace, if by the beginning of praise he means praise of the Truth, praise, or praise of the Truth itself, or praise of the Truth His creation, then praise is that it is praise, praise of Him, then its beginning is knowledge that it is praise, and if He means by it praise of the Truth itself, then its beginning is identity, for it is unseen and never appears, and if He means by it praise of the Truth is His creation, then its beginning is adding creation to Him. God Almighty and no other than Him, an