Here are the prophets of the saints, the people of general prophecy, so he has stated this statement that God has given him what he did not give them, for God has made them virtuous and virtuous, so such is not denied.

Truthfulness is only for the followers, and the prophets who have laws are truthful, unlike the prophets of the saints who were in the periods. Rather, the prophets who have laws are truthful because the people of this position do not take legislation except from the spirit that brings it down to their hearts, and it is an informational revelation, not a scientific revelation, so they do not receive it except with the quality of faith. And they do not reveal it except with His light, for they are friends with the spirits that descend upon them in that way. Likewise, everyone who receives from God what he receives from the fact that the truth in that revelation is informant receives it from the side of faith and His light, not from the manifestation, for the manifestation does not give faith by what it gives, but rather it gives that with the light of reason, not in terms of He is a believer .

The parts of truthfulness, according to what we have mentioned, are not limited, for it is not known what God gives in His information to those to whom He informs. The limited parts of truthfulness are what is reported by the divine news, that believing that news brings one closer to God according to designation, and it is related to the true name. It is necessary for that, so it is imagined here from the principles. God's way, and that there is nothing but the truthful, for there is no informant except God, so he should not lie about any of the news.

We said: The truthful is the one who does not lie about any piece of news if he receives it from the truthful person. However, if the truthful person has knowledge of God such that he knows that there is no informer except God, then he is obliged to believe every piece of news according to what the informant informed him. So if the truthful one informs the truth that a people They lied about something they reported. God was truthful in His report that they lied about everything He told them. They lied about it, and that lying is a characteristic in relation to them, not in relation to the news. If the news is attributed to the truthful, it is truthful, and if you attribute it to the liar in it, it is a lie, and if you attribute it to the liar, it is not in it. It was possible, and the one who believes that the informer is the truthful God, then that news in that case is truthful and the one who believes in it is a friend. Then the truthful one tells the truth that that news that y

The form of truthfulness in lying is that the lying informer only reported an existential matter that is correct in his imagination, since if he had not imagined it, the meaning would have occurred to him, it would not have been valid for him to report about it what he reported, so he is truthful in his reporting of that and the believer in him is a friend. Then he told the truth about that news that in relation to The sense is a lie and is not exposed to the imagination, just as the informer in his experience of that information was not exposed to the sense. Rather, the listener has, at the beginning of his hearing of the news, only the first level, which is the sense. Then after that he rises in the ranks of the powerful, so he believes after this, with the truthful information about him, that this is a lie in the sense. It is a lie in the sense. That is, there is no form in the sense of it in terms of the apparent ruling, so it is a friend of the true report. There is no lie in

If you wish, you can say after this that truthfulness has limited parts, and if you wish, you can say that its parts are not included under the bridge. And if by parts of truthfulness you mean the quality by which truthfulness is obtained for a friend, then this is another question that can be asked about. The answer to such a view is that among its parts is soundness of mind, correct thought, and imagination. The correct view is the belief in the truthfulness of the informant, even if it is referred to by reason that is not sound according to people of this quality, and the statement of the impossibility of possibility in possible entities by looking at what is required by the essence of the necessary entity to exist for its own sake, or to prior knowledge of it according to the one who says so. If it is of this ideal, truthfulness is obtained for him, and this is the sum of its parts because they are not With an addition to the same sum, and this is the green light