If it were not for the existence of the test and its reparation *** in it, souls would not have refused if they refused

God Almighty said: On the Day when their tongues and their hands and their feet will bear witness against them as to what they were They work and for this reason they say to their skins, “When you bear witness against them, why did you bear witness against us?” Then the skins say, “God, who has made all things speak, have spoken to us,” and they became blind. So the skins were more knowledgeable about the matter than those who made speech a separate criterion for man in particular, and stripped non-humans from the sum of his limits in animality and speech. So whoever misses the witnesses has missed a lot of knowledge, so do not judge. On what you did not see, and say, God knows best what He created, and man created his body, and He bore witness to what he did. Do you see him bearing witness to what he did not kno

As for talking about things of taste, it is correct, but not in terms of understanding, but every taster has an example that is set, so he can understand from it what suits that example in particular. Therefore, it does not reveal a truth except in the common taste that can be agreed upon, such as talking about things of the senses with every person with senses who has perceived that information about him. With his sense and knowledge of the word that indicates it, by collusion between the two addressees, we do not doubt, if the Qur’an is recited to us, that we have heard the word of God, and Moses, peace be upon him, when God spoke to him, he heard the word of God, and where is Moses among us in this hearing? For such things happen the taste news, for what is perceived by the one who hears the word of God. In Himself from God by raising the mediators what can be equal in perception to the one who hears it by translating it from Him, for the one who has the mediation has the choic