In the science of monotheism, except for those who say by the way, and not with those who say to deny the occasion, because monotheism is not an existential matter, but rather a ratio, and the lineage is not perceived by revelation, but is learned through evidence, for revelation is vision, and seeing from the visible is not related except to the ways in which the visible is based. Is there anything in that? Divine impurity is a method or not, then the evidence denies the method. If he wants that it has no method in itself, then he does not reveal it, and if he wants that its method is incomprehensible, then he can reveal it in terms of what has an incomprehensible method, but knowledge of it is obtained when it is revealed, for every method is obtained by the mind from his consideration of it. Things are impossible for him, provided that belief is established in their names, not in their intelligibility, such as descent, leveling, conjunction, fluctuation, hesitation, laughter, a

Polytheism in names is not ignorant *** The people of revelation have relied on it

They said, “What is the Most Merciful?” We said to them, “He is God, the First Judge.”

There is no difference between God in His being. *** It indicates the essence and what He asks.

It has nouns in everything that the speaker pronounces or makes sense of.

And polytheism is praiseworthy at its door *** with the one who knows or is ignorant.

It is pure existence that does not measure *** in it there is an imam. His ruling is Faisal

But what is reprehensible about him is the one who *** confirmed it in his invalid contract .

God Almighty said: Say, “Call upon God” or “Call upon the Most Merciful.” Whatever you call upon, to Him belong the most beautiful names. Know that God Almighty, in terms of His essence, is the One and Only. Who Where a ratio is requested by that name, what is the essence of the essence, and God Almighty does not answer you despite the high existence of that ratio? If you know this, you will know many things in one eye. The essence does not make sense when invoking these names without these ratios, and you do not make sense of the ratios without this essence. So if you say, O All-Knowing, you know that what makes sense is different. Reasonable, O Almighty, and likewise, O Desire, O Hearer, O All-Seeing, O Grateful, O Living, O Sustainable, O All-Sufficient, and whatever you wish of the beautiful names. These lineages, even if they are many, then the one named is one, and the one to whom these lineages are attributed is one, so if the multiplicity in this one is not intelligible ex